[edk2-devel] OvmfPkgX64 doesn't build with CLANG38 (clang 14.0.3) NOOPT - undefined reference to `memcpy'

Wed May 25 23:54:06 UTC 2022

Jiewen,

I'm definitely talking about the long term. Fixing this by just replacing
it with CopyMem is definitely the right call for the stable tag.

Best regards,
Pedro

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:35 AM Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com> wrote:

> OK. Just want to clarify:
>
>
>
>    1. Are you discussing the solution now to resolve this issue, maybe in
>    this stable tag?
>    2. Or are you discussing the long term solution?
>
>
>
> For me, I am focusing on #1 how to resolve this issue in this stable tag.
>
>
>
> I am not talking long term solution #2 here. I think that need wider
> discussion in EDKII.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2022 7:31 AM
> *To:* edk2-devel-groups-io <devel at edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <
> jiewen.yao at intel.com>
> *Cc:* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>; Rebecca Cran <
> quic_rcran at quicinc.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>;
> Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <
> kraxel at redhat.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] OvmfPkgX64 doesn't build with CLANG38 (clang
> 14.0.3) NOOPT - undefined reference to `memcpy'
>
>
>
> Right. But as I said, GCC and Clang depend on 4 standard C library
> functions. This behavior is documented, and has been stable for probably
> the past decade or more. These are not intrinsics, but bog standard
> functions you can totally redirect to the existing UEFI ones. I talked with
> the LLVM people on IRC and they confirmed that that was essentially the
> reason why it used a memcpy call.
>
> It's, in my opinion, OK to fix this particular issue if for example Visual
> Studio does something fancier or requires actual intrinsics, but having
> support for this would probably better solidify future compilation using
> GNU-like toolchains.
>
>
>
> Slightly offtopic, but I would dare to say that moving towards memcpy()
> and others(versus CopyMem(), etc) would benefit EDK2 generated ASM quality
> as the compiler has more of an idea of what you want to accomplish, if you
> pass -fbuiltin and let it assume your standard C library has the correct
> behavior; and indeed, GCC and Clang can, for instance, transform memcpy()
> calls into rep movsb's or whatnot based on the CPU microarch it's compiling
> for, or completely alias them if it sees you're doing it because of pointer
> aliasing.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pedro
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:58 PM Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com> wrote:
>
> “Don’t use structure assignment” is our best known method to avoid
> compiler intrinsic in EDKII coding style since the project is created.
>
> A third part library may include structure assignment, then we have to
> link intrinsic.
>
>
>
> If you only talk about memcpy, that is easy. But there might be others.
> The problem is: We don’t know how many intrinsic should be there. It is
> fully based upon compiler.
>
>
>
> Gerd proposed to move to intrinsic from cryptopkg to mdepkg. But it is not
> done yet.
>
>
>
> To me, using MemCopy is much easier to resolve this problem.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Yao Jiewen
>
>
>
> *From:* devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> *On Behalf Of *Pedro
> Falcato
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2022 6:48 AM
> *To:* Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
> *Cc:* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>; edk2-devel-groups-io <
> devel at edk2.groups.io>; Rebecca Cran <quic_rcran at quicinc.com>; Ard
> Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>; Justen, Jordan L <
> jordan.l.justen at intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] OvmfPkgX64 doesn't build with CLANG38 (clang
> 14.0.3) NOOPT - undefined reference to `memcpy'
>
>
>
> Is there a legitimate reason not to define memcpy? It'd be easier to do so
> and comply to the compiler's requirements.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022, 23:38 Yao, Jiewen, <jiewen.yao at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Would you please use CopyMem() for the structure assignment?
>
> VgpuGop->GopModeInfo  = *GopModeInfo;
>
>
>
> That is best known method to resolve memcpy symbol issue.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Yao Jiewen
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2022 1:01 AM
> *To:* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> *Cc:* edk2-devel-groups-io <devel at edk2.groups.io>; Rebecca Cran <
> quic_rcran at quicinc.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>;
> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] OvmfPkgX64 doesn't build with CLANG38 (clang
> 14.0.3) NOOPT - undefined reference to `memcpy'
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:45 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 18:44, Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:50 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 17:08, Rebecca Cran <quic_rcran at quicinc.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I noticed OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc doesn't build with `-t CLANG38 -b
> >> > NOOPT` (with clang version 14.0.2) with the latest edk2 master
> >> > (07c0c2eb0a5970db614ebce1060fc79d6904bdfd):
> >> >
> >> > make: Nothing to be done for 'tbuild'.
> >> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/ld: DWARF error: invalid or unhandled FORM
> value:
> >> > 0x23
> >> >
> /home/bcran/src/upstream/uefi/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe/VirtioGpu/OUTPUT/VirtioGpuDxe.lib(Gop.obj):
> >> > in function `GopSetMode':
> >> > Gop.c:(.text.GopSetMode+0x418): undefined reference to `memcpy'
> >>
> >> Can you dump the object file to see where the memcpy() call is emitted?
> >
> > I think I found the smoking gun:
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/916f90baa547b3ebef8fa87c530e2f0c8e35e1e3/OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe/Gop.c#L512
>
> Indeed. We don't support struct assignment in Tianocore code, exactly
> for this reason.
>
> Note: We should think about providing some basic libc functions in base
> EDK2 as some are required by the clang/GCC compilers (see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html, grep for memcpy or
> freestanding).
>
> Passing -ffreestanding would also be a good idea as to let the compiler
> know it's dealing with a freestanding environment vs a hosted user-space
> one.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Pedro
>
>
>
> --
>
> Pedro Falcato
> 
>
>

-- 
Pedro Falcato

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#90024): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/90024
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/91335000/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20220526/8fee1976/attachment-0001.htm>