[edk2-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior

Ard Biesheuvel ardb at kernel.org
Fri Oct 21 13:17:58 UTC 2022


On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 00:37, Dionna Amalie Glaze
<dionnaglaze at google.com> wrote:
>
> > That assumes the variable is non-volatile, but I suppose we could use
> > a volatile variable [other than OsIndications] as well.
> >
>
> I suppose that's true. Would you prefer volatile versions of
> OsIndications/OsIndicationsSupported added to the spec, or this
> proposed one-off toggle protocol? No specified global variables seem
> overloadable with this duty.
>

No it would have to be a completely separate variable, I don't think
we can use OsIndications for this.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#95471): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95471
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/94144524/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list