[edk2-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior

[Dionna Glaze via groups.io]

> > I suppose that's true. Would you prefer volatile versions of
> > OsIndications/OsIndicationsSupported added to the spec, or this
> > proposed one-off toggle protocol? No specified global variables seem
> > overloadable with this duty.
> >
>
> No it would have to be a completely separate variable, I don't think
> we can use OsIndications for this.

Certainly, I meant new variables that are volatile and also play a
similar role as OsIndications[Supported].

-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#95472): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95472
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/94144524/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-