Fedora Legacy needs help!

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 09 October 2006 03:53, Mark J Cox wrote:
> Would limiting the scope of errata support help stop Legacy being
> overwhelmed with updates?
>
> In my opinion if Legacy was a project that fixed only security issues
> rated severity critical (plus say kernel privilege escalation issues), it
> would still be providing an important level of protection to users whilst
> limiting the amount of work.  For example for Enterprise Linux 4 we issued
> about 20 updates a year that would fall into this category.
> http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/

I think this might be acceptable.  We're still in a major hole wrt RHL7.3/RHL9 
and FC3/4 that we'd have to dig our way out of, even if we limited it to 
Critical severity stuff, and this is where we need some initial help to dig 
our way out to a manegable workflow.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/attachments/20061009/b1130fca/attachment.sig>