[Freeipa-devel] Correct xmlrpc-c version?

[John Dennis]

On 08/08/2011 11:42 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 10:07 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
>> I checked today to see if we have a new xmlrpc-c package that meets our
>> release requirements for 2.1. I see that 1.27.4 was build earlier today
>> for F16 and F17 with the changelog comment just saying it was upgraded
>> to latest upstream (is that our fix?). The upstream tarball does not
>> have a changelog :-( but there is a reference to this URL for change
>> history:
>>
>> http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/change.html
>>
>> But not much useful information there either.
>>
>> Can someone tell me *exactly* what it is we're waiting for so I can be
>> sure we've got the right release? Also it doesn't look like there has
>> been a rebuild of F15 for a long time so even if F16 and F17 have 1.27.4
>> and 1.27.4 is what we're looking for (is it?) then that still doesn't
>> meet our needs because we're targeting F15 right?
>>
>
> Good news is that the problem in curl package has been fixed and was
> built for F-15:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/curl-7.21.3-9.fc15
>
> But we need this change to be propagated to the xmlrpc-c too. As you
> wrote, there is already a fixed version for F-16 and F-17:
> xmlrpc-c-1.16.24. I checked the source code, the GSSAPI delegation fix
> should be there. We just need to ask them to release an update for F-15
> too. Adding xmlrpc-c Fedora owner to the CC list. Enrico, can you please
> release the package for F-15 too?
>
> When all this is ready, I plan to immediately send a patch&  update
> our .spec to make this work on F-15.

You're talking about just the Fedora spec file right? Aren't we also 
supposed to be doing a RHEL 6.2 build and doesn't RHEL 6.2 have the same 
issues and requirements?

-- 
John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com>

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/