[redhat-lspp] Re: MLS enforcing PTYs, sshd, and newrole

Steve Grubb sgrubb at redhat.com
Thu Oct 19 13:32:11 UTC 2006


On Thursday 19 October 2006 09:21, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> If we then remove -l from newrole we are done?

And would doing this also mean we do not need to add pam_namespace to newrole?

-Steve




More information about the redhat-lspp mailing list