[redhat-lspp] Re: MLS enforcing PTYs, sshd, and newrole

[Stephen Smalley]

On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 09:32 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 09:21, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > If we then remove -l from newrole we are done?
> 
> And would doing this also mean we do not need to add pam_namespace to newrole?

Well, some people want pam_namespace functionality for roles, not just
levels.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency