[almighty] Terminology: work item -> planner item

[Baiju Muthukadan]

Hi All,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger <alr at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Baiju Muthukadan <bmuthuka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can we change what we are calling today as work item to planner item ?
>
>
> Nope. :)
>
> Work Items are more generic; they may represent entities not part of the Planner,
> but instead in Build, Code, etc services.

In the Core, we have "work item type" as the generic one. May be we
should also rename "work item type" to "work item".

Regards,
Baiju M