[almighty] Terminology: work item -> planner item

Michael Kleinhenz kleinhenz at redhat.com
Thu Sep 22 16:16:09 UTC 2016


The first one is the model, the second one the instance. Different things..!

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Baiju Muthukadan <bmuthuka at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger <alr at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Baiju Muthukadan <bmuthuka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Can we change what we are calling today as work item to planner item ?
>>
>>
>> Nope. :)
>>
>> Work Items are more generic; they may represent entities not part of the Planner,
>> but instead in Build, Code, etc services.
>
> In the Core, we have "work item type" as the generic one. May be we
> should also rename "work item type" to "work item".
>
> Regards,
> Baiju M
>
> _______________________________________________
> almighty-public mailing list
> almighty-public at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public



-- 
Michael Kleinhenz
Principal Software Engineer

Red Hat Deutschland GmbH
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany

RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht München,
HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
Michael O'Neill




More information about the almighty-public mailing list