[almighty] Idea: modelling iterations

[Michael Kleinhenz]

Another possible model would be to have Iterations itself as a WIT.
Although this would require much more work on manage iterations (like,
create iteration would mean actual creation of a WI instead of just
attaching a label value). On the other hand, querying for iteration
contents could be simpler (by using query ops already there for
queries on WIs).


On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Michael Kleinhenz <kleinhenz at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if core already has iterations in place with it's core
> model. If not, would it be a good idea to model the iterations with
> labels (or tags or keywords, whatever it can be called)?
>
> This would generalize the concept of wi-to-iteration mappings to a
> more generic approach and would possibly enable much more flexibility
> with different planning approaches (like, Scrum 4.0 in 2033 ;-).
>
> An iteration mapping would then just be a special case of label.
>
> See GMail as a very similar case: generalizing the concept of folders
> (mail-to-folder mapping) to labels, enabling lot's of interesting
> usecases.
>
> -- Michael
>
> --
> Michael Kleinhenz
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat Deutschland GmbH
> Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
> 85630 Grasbrunn
> Germany
>
> RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
> Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht München,
> HRB 153243,
> Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
> Michael O'Neill



-- 
Michael Kleinhenz
Principal Software Engineer

Red Hat Deutschland GmbH
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany

RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht München,
HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
Michael O'Neill