[almighty] Idea: modelling iterations

[Thomas Mäder]

On 09/26/2016 11:07 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Yes, they could eventually grow into be generically defined but I 
> think to start with we could start very basic - I for one do not think 
> they should be munged into being work item/work item types at our API 
> level. Not everything is a java.lang.Object either ;)
Actually, you're making my point: everything IS an instance of 
java.lang.Object. so you can write

Object foo= new Iteration();
foo.hashCode();
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/almighty-public/attachments/20160926/a9e888c2/attachment.htm>