[almighty] Idea: modelling iterations

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On 26 Sep 2016, at 11:53, Thomas Mäder wrote:

> On 09/26/2016 11:07 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Yes, they could eventually grow into be generically defined but I 
>> think to start with we could start very basic - I for one do not 
>> think they should be munged into being work item/work item types at 
>> our API level. Not everything is a java.lang.Object either ;)
> Actually, you're making my point: everything IS an instance of 
> java.lang.Object. so you can write
>
> Object foo= new Iteration();
> foo.hashCode();

integers are not objects - they can be auto-casted in later versions.

:)

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen