[almighty] Multitenancy

[Andrew Lee Rubinger]

On Sep 26, 2016 5:01 PM, "Monica Granfield" <mgranfie at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> One scenario to ask about here... around keeping status in sync with
multi-tenants.... Is this something that is good or has been thought about
at all?..

I am not sure I understand the question, Monica.  Could you elaborate?

>
> -Monica
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On 23 Sep 2016, at 0:44, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
>>
>>> I think the question is about more than a URL scheme.
>>>
>>> We've been considering "Project" as our top-level container entity, but
>>> there really exists "system" above that.
>>>
>>> By that measure, we can contain in a system:
>>>
>>> * Users
>>> * Projects
>>>
>>> ...and then map permissions between users and roles at the project
level.
>>>
>>> How does "Organization" map into that?
>>
>>
>> Good points and I like the notion of "system".
>>
>> The way GitHub and I think VSO does it is that Organizations are
owners/containers of projects and users can also be owners.
>> Which is why they often share namespace, i.e. cannot have both a user
and org called "maxandersen".
>>
>> /max
>>
>>>
>>> S,
>>> ALR
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Todd Mancini <tmancini at redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not clear to me what URLs have to do with multi-tenancy. The VSTS
>>>> approach (which is actually one "org" per FQDN, but with infinite
>>>> projects per org) was chosen for technical reasons, not product
>>>> management ones.
>>>>
>>>> So, do you have a technical preference?
>>>>
>>>> The GitHub model seems to work well. But since we also plan to handle
>>>> enterprise SSO (via SAML, for example), the Gmail model also works well
>>>> (as far as PM is concerned). I'm not married to particular URL schemes.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my phone, so anticipate hilarious autocorrectsFrom: Max
>>>> Rydahl Andersen
>>>> Sent: ‎9/‎22/‎2016 6:24 PM
>>>> To: Andrew Lee Rubinger
>>>> Cc: ALMighty-public
>>>> Subject: Re: [almighty] Multitenancy
>>>> On 22 Sep 2016, at 21:08, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Baiju Muthukadan
>>>>> <bmuthuka at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ALMighty architecture is going to support Multitenancy, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>> To the bone, yes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> what is unclear though is how the multi tenancy will work.
>>>>
>>>> i.e. is it like github/jira where one instance under one url has many
>>>> projects with shared users/orgs
>>>> or is it more like VSO where each domain has one project with users
>>>> shared across many domains.
>>>>
>>>> Eagerly waiting for some of the "new project" PDD/UX stories to
actually
>>>> start getting that settled down.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Baiju M
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> almighty-public mailing list
>>>>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Red Hat Developer Programs Architecture
>>>>> @ALRubinger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> almighty-public mailing list
>>>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> almighty-public mailing list
>>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Red Hat Developer Programs Architecture
>>> @ALRubinger
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> almighty-public mailing list
>> almighty-public at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/almighty-public/attachments/20160926/3f13c895/attachment.htm>