[almighty] Multitenancy

[Monica Granfield]

Sure... if a WI has a status, and the status changes, will it immediately
persist and be updated anywhere that WI is viewed. In the past I have run
into scenarios about concurrency with objects based on how multi-tenancy is
structured. So just want to ask if all data is live or will require updates
to see current statuses, states or otherwise...?



On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger <alr at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sep 26, 2016 5:01 PM, "Monica Granfield" <mgranfie at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > One scenario to ask about here... around keeping status in sync with
> multi-tenants.... Is this something that is good or has been thought about
> at all?..
>
> I am not sure I understand the question, Monica.  Could you elaborate?
>
> >
> > -Monica
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <
> manderse at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23 Sep 2016, at 0:44, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the question is about more than a URL scheme.
> >>>
> >>> We've been considering "Project" as our top-level container entity, but
> >>> there really exists "system" above that.
> >>>
> >>> By that measure, we can contain in a system:
> >>>
> >>> * Users
> >>> * Projects
> >>>
> >>> ...and then map permissions between users and roles at the project
> level.
> >>>
> >>> How does "Organization" map into that?
> >>
> >>
> >> Good points and I like the notion of "system".
> >>
> >> The way GitHub and I think VSO does it is that Organizations are
> owners/containers of projects and users can also be owners.
> >> Which is why they often share namespace, i.e. cannot have both a user
> and org called "maxandersen".
> >>
> >> /max
> >>
> >>>
> >>> S,
> >>> ALR
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Todd Mancini <tmancini at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It's not clear to me what URLs have to do with multi-tenancy. The VSTS
> >>>> approach (which is actually one "org" per FQDN, but with infinite
> >>>> projects per org) was chosen for technical reasons, not product
> >>>> management ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, do you have a technical preference?
> >>>>
> >>>> The GitHub model seems to work well. But since we also plan to handle
> >>>> enterprise SSO (via SAML, for example), the Gmail model also works
> well
> >>>> (as far as PM is concerned). I'm not married to particular URL
> schemes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my phone, so anticipate hilarious autocorrectsFrom: Max
> >>>> Rydahl Andersen
> >>>> Sent: ‎9/‎22/‎2016 6:24 PM
> >>>> To: Andrew Lee Rubinger
> >>>> Cc: ALMighty-public
> >>>> Subject: Re: [almighty] Multitenancy
> >>>> On 22 Sep 2016, at 21:08, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Baiju Muthukadan
> >>>>> <bmuthuka at redhat.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ALMighty architecture is going to support Multitenancy, right?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> To the bone, yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> what is unclear though is how the multi tenancy will work.
> >>>>
> >>>> i.e. is it like github/jira where one instance under one url has many
> >>>> projects with shared users/orgs
> >>>> or is it more like VSO where each domain has one project with users
> >>>> shared across many domains.
> >>>>
> >>>> Eagerly waiting for some of the "new project" PDD/UX stories to
> actually
> >>>> start getting that settled down.
> >>>>
> >>>> /max
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Baiju M
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> almighty-public mailing list
> >>>>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
> >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Red Hat Developer Programs Architecture
> >>>>> @ALRubinger
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> almighty-public mailing list
> >>>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> /max
> >>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> almighty-public mailing list
> >>>> almighty-public at redhat.com
> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Red Hat Developer Programs Architecture
> >>> @ALRubinger
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> /max
> >> http://about.me/maxandersen
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> almighty-public mailing list
> >> almighty-public at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/almighty-public/attachments/20160927/3db485da/attachment.htm>