[Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts
Ademar Reis
areis at redhat.com
Mon Sep 11 13:40:03 UTC 2017
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> Hello Guannan,
>
> theoretically we should not accept such backport, because it's a
> new feature, not a bugfix. Anyway it touches `avocado.utils` and
> it's not changing existing callbacks. What do you think, guys? In
> my view the `avocado/core` is the core and I wouldn't like such
> changes there, but I'd be fine with some exceptions when it goes
> to `avocado/utils`.
I think 36lts should not be touched, unless you're doing a critical
bugfix, which is not the case here.
It's not just about a simple backport, it's about expectations and
maintenance of a LTS release. Think of new versions, release notes,
"interrupting" conservative users, testing, potential for
regressions, etc. This would create a bad precedent.
Just my 2 cents.
Thanks.
- Ademar
> Dne 8.9.2017 v 08:41 Guannan Sun napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > As RHEL6 still need use 36lts, and cases updated with using the function in
> > PR 1376:
> >
> > https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado/pull/1376
> >
> > could you help backport the commits to 36lts?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Guannan
> >
>
>
--
Ademar Reis
Red Hat
^[:wq!
More information about the Avocado-devel
mailing list