164LX memory quetion PC100 or PC133?

Steven N. Hirsch shirsch at adelphia.net
Mon Jun 27 22:08:09 UTC 2005


On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Steven Moix - Axianet.ch wrote:

> That's not a problem, I have PC133 on my 164LX.

YMMV! Some older machines will not work with newer "high-density" memory 
modules.  

Steve

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob smith" <sfmc68 at verizon.net>
> To: "Linux and Red Hat on Alpha processors" <axp-list at redhat.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 5:36 PM
> Subject: 164LX memory quetion PC100 or PC133?
> 
> 
> > I can find PC100 or PC133 unregisterd ECC SDRAMs in 168pin form.
> > Is there any issue with using 133?
> > tks
> > bob
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dance like no one is watching, sing like no one is listening, live like
> > it is your last day.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > axp-list mailing list
> > axp-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> axp-list mailing list
> axp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
> 

Quote of the Year:
 
"The five person voting panel voted 57 to 3.14 in 
 favour of getting rid of the Diebold machines."
   - 'Downside'




More information about the axp-list mailing list