164LX memory quetion PC100 or PC133?

[Steven Moix - Axianet.ch]

That's another problem :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven N. Hirsch" <shirsch at adelphia.net>
To: "Linux on Alpha processors" <axp-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: 164LX memory quetion PC100 or PC133?


> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Steven Moix - Axianet.ch wrote:
>
>> That's not a problem, I have PC133 on my 164LX.
>
> YMMV! Some older machines will not work with newer "high-density" memory
> modules.
>
> Steve
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob smith" <sfmc68 at verizon.net>
>> To: "Linux and Red Hat on Alpha processors" <axp-list at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 5:36 PM
>> Subject: 164LX memory quetion PC100 or PC133?
>>
>>
>> > I can find PC100 or PC133 unregisterd ECC SDRAMs in 168pin form.
>> > Is there any issue with using 133?
>> > tks
>> > bob
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Dance like no one is watching, sing like no one is listening, live like
>> > it is your last day.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > axp-list mailing list
>> > axp-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> axp-list mailing list
>> axp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>>
>
> Quote of the Year:
>
> "The five person voting panel voted 57 to 3.14 in
> favour of getting rid of the Diebold machines."
>   - 'Downside'
>
> _______________________________________________
> axp-list mailing list
> axp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>