Current ISO images status

[Oliver Falk]

Jay Estabrook schrieb:
> Yes, well, I DID do that for FC8, but this time around:
> 
> 1. upstream had taken all the anaconda Alpha FC8 patches EXCEPT that one,
>    so I didn't/wouldn't have to touch the FC9 anaconda at all

Great thing is that the partitioner now works like a charm!

> 2. if selinux was active and caused problems, maybe someone (else :-)
>    would fix it properly.

I'm not sure if selinux in the kernel is well implemented... It could 
cost months to *really* fix it :-)

> At least, those are my excuses... ;-}
> 
> It WOULD be nice to have a functioning SELinux on Alpha, yes?

Do we really want to have selinux working on Alpha?

I don't even use it on Intel :-)

Best,
  Oliver