Fw: [pro_tech] Study: Safest OS isn't Windows--or Linux

[Tom Masterson]

Got it.  Hadn't looked far enough back in the pile of email.

Thanks
Tom
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "technomage" <technomage-hawke at cox.net>
To: <blinux-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 05:08
Subject: Re: Fw: [pro_tech] Study: Safest OS isn't Windows--or Linux


> I was not the one that originally printed the article. I commented on it.
the
> link should have been included.
>
> I may have missed it in the original posting. a cursorysearch of zdnet
might
> be in order though.... Still, I really don't trust zdnet to be fair about
> things other than windows.
>
> Technomage Hawke
>
> On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:41 am, Tom Masterson wrote:
> > Do you have the link to the rest of the article?
> >
> > By the way the statement you printed is nothing new nor is it untrue.  I
am
> > not an expert in linux but I do know that it is only as secure as you
have
> > the ability and know how to make it so by closing the purts and entry
> > points.  There is no totally safe OS except the one that is on a
standalone
> > machine that is never hooked to a network (internet especially) and
rarely
> > gets new software on it.
> >
> > Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>