Fw: [pro_tech] Study: Safest OS isn't Windows--or Linux

Tom Masterson kd7cyu at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 24 13:24:26 UTC 2004

Got it.  Hadn't looked far enough back in the pile of email.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "technomage" <technomage-hawke at cox.net>
To: <blinux-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 05:08
Subject: Re: Fw: [pro_tech] Study: Safest OS isn't Windows--or Linux

> I was not the one that originally printed the article. I commented on it.
> link should have been included.
> I may have missed it in the original posting. a cursorysearch of zdnet
> be in order though.... Still, I really don't trust zdnet to be fair about
> things other than windows.
> Technomage Hawke
> On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:41 am, Tom Masterson wrote:
> > Do you have the link to the rest of the article?
> >
> > By the way the statement you printed is nothing new nor is it untrue.  I
> > not an expert in linux but I do know that it is only as secure as you
> > the ability and know how to make it so by closing the purts and entry
> > points.  There is no totally safe OS except the one that is on a
> > machine that is never hooked to a network (internet especially) and
> > gets new software on it.
> >
> > Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

More information about the Blinux-list mailing list