muscript smiles. a *very* odd question especially for me.
klewellen at shellworld.net
Fri Jul 24 04:12:17 UTC 2015
I am clearly very distracted, and you are clearly very brilliant. this
program looks stunning, but I have some musician questions that will really
put the list to sleep.
May I write you privately?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Peter Billam wrote:
> Hi. Karen wrote:
>> but as you say manually putting all the parts into lillypond
>> may have its drawbacks.
> I'm sorry if I gave that impression; I would never want to imply that.
> Lilypond is the best, there's nothing it can't do.
> And for robustness and longevity,
> just check out the size of their development team, at the bottom of:
> The introductory manuals are at, for example:
> but those pages are not very accessible, unfortunately :-(
>> abc notation comes with packages that might a low the audio
>> say one track at a time to be converted into their program ...
>> Are you aware of this package?
> Oh, sure:
> If you're writing in the single line, it is absolutely The Standard,
> because (given that restriction) it's ultra-easy to use,
> very very compact and readable.
> Muscript, which I use all the time:
> lies between lilypond and abc; it has most of the flexibility
> of lilypond, and most of the simplicity of abc.
> They all use text-input, very accessible :-)
> ( They all run on windows too, eg:
> though to run muscript on windows you need to install Perl, or cygwin
> Once your score is in muscript form,
> there's really no need to convert it into anything else.
> Once your score is in lilypond form,
> there's _absolutely_ no need to convert it into anything else :-)
> Regards, Peter Billam
> http://www.pjb.com.au pj at pjb.com.au (03) 6278 9410
> "Follow the charge, not the particle." -- Richard Feynman
> from The Theory of Positrons, Physical Review, 1949
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
More information about the Blinux-list