amazon?

[Linux for blind general discussion]

sorry, typing with my nose a bit.
Indeed I mean Web Content Access Guidelines 2.0 thanks for this article 
too.



On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:

> I posted a link to this article in response to another post, but a web search 
> will result in a lot of other articles: 
> https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/1/20750913/dominos-pizza-website-accessible-blind-supreme-court-lawsuit
>
>
> BTW, do you mean WCAG 2.0 instead of WACG 2.0? I just want to make sure I'm 
> not missing something. I also did just realize that I was mistakenly 
> referring to it as WCAD, so sorry for any confusion.
>
>
> -- 
> Christopher (CJ)
> Chaltain at Gmail
>
>
> On 8/25/19 6:32 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
>>  really?
>>  Can you direct me to any press on this?  why them and not pizza hut or
>>  paypal  or another company?  Is the access rooted in wacg 2.0? or the
>>  far  less productive focus on a specific access tool, a concept which
>>  itself violates wacg 2.0?
>> 
>>
>>  On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
>> 
>> >  And yet Domino's is being sued because their web site and app is not 
>> >  accessible.
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  I agree with you but that doesn't mean law suits should never be filed.
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  -- 
>> >  Christopher (CJ)
>> >  Chaltain at Gmail
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  On 8/25/19 4:21 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
>> > >   The problem is most of us don't have money to hire lawyers. You'd be
>> > >   amazed how many people are screwed over, shoved aside and ignored 
>> > >  because
>> > >   they lack the money, connections and clout to do anything. Companies
>> > >   aren't going to listen to a few, or even a few hundred customers, 
>> > >  unless
>> > >   there's a clear advantage for them. That's why a lot of these 
>> > >  complaints
>> > >   never go anywhere.
>> > > 
>> > >   ----- Original Message -----
>> > >   From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> > >   To: blinux-list at redhat.com
>> > >   Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 16:18:37 -0500
>> > >   Subject: Re: amazon?
>> > > 
>> > > >   I agree litigation should be a final step, but there are also 
>> > >  certain
>> > >   sections of the blindness community who don't think law suits should
>> > >   ever be used, and IMHO, this is just another extreme that should be
>> > >   avoided. If a company isn't following the law, and nothing else is
>> > >   working, then law suits are a perfectly reasonable tool.
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >   _______________________________________________
>> > >   Blinux-list mailing list
>> > >   Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> > >   https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > 
>> >  -- 
>> >  Christopher (CJ)
>> >  Chaltain at Gmail
>> > 
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> >  Blinux-list mailing list
>> >  Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > 
>> > 
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Blinux-list mailing list
>>  Blinux-list at redhat.com
>>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
> -- 
> Christopher (CJ)
> Chaltain at Gmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>