[Container-tools] using openshift origin v3 to back centos build pipeline

[Aaron Weitekamp]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 20/07/15 10:53, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Quoting Aaron Weitekamp (2015-07-17 21:23:53)
> >> Looking deeper into the capabilities of openshift origin[1] have we
> >> considered this as the core tech for pushing image content through the
> >> pipeline? I don't think I'm on the right mailing lists for this
> discussion.
> >> I'm just curious on the direction here.
> >>
> >> [1] https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.0/dev_guide/builds.html
> >>
> > We have discussed this (using fullblown osbs [1][2] for pipeline).
> >
> > Not sure what's the current architecture for pipeline atm.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/projectatomic/osbs-client
> > [2]
> https://github.com/projectatomic/osbs-client/blob/master/docs/osbs_instance_setup.md
> >
>
> does'nt OSOv3 also run OSBS under the hood ?
>
> we looked at OSBS and the layers that get added on dont really scale
> very well to multiple, on demand sort of installations. For that, we're
> just using atomicapp-builder and dock ( now atomic-reactor ).
>

​Thanks for the info. I'm trying to sync what we're building vs. what tools
​end-users might use to build out a CI/CD workflow. OpenShift makes a lot
of sense and I would assume scaling issues will be resolved in upcoming
releases.



>
> regards,
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project, London, UK
> RH Ext. 8274455 | DID: 0044 207 009 4455
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20150720/0cd72ecf/attachment.htm>