[Container-tools] Should we bump Atomic App to 0.2.0 with the Beta-3 branch?

[Christoph Görn]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Heya,
 actually its not exactly major.minor.build, its:


    MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
    MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible
manner, and
    PATCH version when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes.

 which has been defined by http://semver.org/

 So you are absolutely right: bumping to 0.2.0 is strongly advised.

	//G

On 11/02/2015 04:11 PM, Charlie Drage wrote:
> Currently we use: major.minor[.build] (correct me if I'm wrong).
> 
> The integration of the Beta-3 branch to the Master branch of
> Atomic App is quite significant, refactoring much of the base code
> as well as implementing new features (for example: no more
> `atomicapp install` to current working directory) as well as new
> CLI commands.
> 
> Anyone else agree that we should bump this up to a 0.2.0 release?
> 

- -- 
Principal Software Engineer - Systems Design & Engineering
Mobile: +49 171 2801345

Follow Us: https://twitter.com/RedHatRefArch
Plus Us: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114152126783830728030/
Like Us: https://www.facebook.com/rhrefarch

Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Sitz: Grasbrunn,
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht München, HRB 153243
Geschäftsführer: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill,
Charles Peters
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=eAXf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----