[Container-tools] Including docker images in ADB Vagrant box
Aaron Weitekamp
aweiteka at redhat.com
Tue Nov 3 21:39:35 UTC 2015
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Langdon White <langdon at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/03/2015 10:19 AM, Vaclav Pavlin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com
>> <mailto:lmohanty at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/2015 08:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/11/15 13:51, Vaclav Pavlin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Karanbir Singh
>> <kbsingh at redhat.com <mailto:kbsingh at redhat.com>
>> <mailto:kbsingh at redhat.com <mailto:kbsingh at redhat.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/10/15 14:27, Vaclav Pavlin wrote:
>>
>> OTOH if the images are already in the box you can have
>> you dev
>> env really local once you pull the Vagrant box and
>> re-upping your
>> box will not require internet connection.
>>
>> but the size of the vagrant box will go up dramatically,
>> and if
>> the only way to ship the updates is via box updates, it
>> might be a
>> case of just having transferred the problem from one place to
>> another.
>>
>>
> I agree, this will make the box quite a bit larger, but, personally, I
> think it is worth it.
>
What troubles me about this discussion is we're guessing at what our
users/customers want. Can we ask them? Who uses this today? If the answer
is "no one" then maybe we defer for now, get feedback, respond.
>
> I also do not think that we would only update via box updates, this is
> just a bootstrap. You could still "docker pull" latest. Obviously, we would
> *also* do box updates but not as the only way to update.
>
> I would really like to see us ship a "caching server" of some sort e.g.
> repofunnel or pulp. However, I don't think those are ready yet for this. We
> could investigate adding docker support to vagrant-cachier[1]. They are
> looking for help anyway, but I am not sure how much work that would be.
>
> langdon
>
> [1]: http://fgrehm.viewdocs.io/vagrant-cachier/
>
> Wont it be a far better solution to just map a local host
>> directory
>> to docker's storage inside the instance via the
>> Vagrantfile ? that
>> way a local cache of the backing store exists on a vagrant
>> destroy
>> and up.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't that be problematic on Windows?
>>
>> no more or less than any other persistent storage in windows.
>> or are
>> you saying that docker is unable to use the shared vol due to
>> filesys
>> attrib etc ?
>>
>> No idea, you are right about generality of this problem, though I would
>> be a bit more concern with the Docker itself (i.e. the laying)
>>
>>
>> How will you put the docker images on the shared directory/storage?
>>
>>
>> IMO, what KB meant, is to pull them on first vagrant up and keep them
>> there for any subsequent destroy && run
>>
>>
>>
>> - -- Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project, London, UK
>> RH Ext. 8274455 | DID: 0044 207 009 4455
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWOMo1AAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtNS4IAMPCHH9RLQAc5V3pmet1DA3y
>> hQEi/kNG0wTkH/wgaVvMOfqfUVR89ylSS9edC8xhq6cueZBdLzAvR8cj4aQbI69V
>> Qc7vkRcsIhp+S4zrpik2+2KZhPg4JkxVTRMSVq0+3H7UklObxqeJxHy7qlTfvee9
>> GCWefnm7uzrpVcuA/HUG8ycilc8pNaw1l0i492x8pPDXxkqYdzOozLZM10uivtXX
>> RdTzt6iRQ6+/7gbVCq3kgzxDeO3xp0W9q4vqBBLh74WddbdOLpweOzPzhx8NKV+F
>> oimKjQtP1r976f3yZ50SeC5th1VT4o2oNQmkQZ8ZAqDGN3fXsNLov35eQbSKdpk=
>> =qbKy
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Container-tools mailing list
>> Container-tools at redhat.com <mailto:Container-tools at redhat.com>
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Container-tools mailing list
>> Container-tools at redhat.com <mailto:Container-tools at redhat.com>
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Architect - Senior Software Engineer
>> Developer Experience
>> Brno, Czech Republic
>> Phone: +420 739 666 824
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Container-tools mailing list
>> Container-tools at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20151103/db97fb0c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Container-tools
mailing list