[Container-tools] [atomic-devel] Adding a "tests" repo

[Charlie Drage]

Hi all, 

adb-tests seems like the consensus name for the repo. Can we have this
repo lifted from private to public?

On 11/21, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> adb-tests is somewhat limited as it implies tests of only the ADB component.  However there seems to be discussion around including Atomic App tests too.
> 
> Should those be in separate repos?  Should it be called atomic-tests?  That would also allow test plans for Atomic Host, Atomic CLI, etc.
> 
> regards,        
> 
> bex
> 
> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty at dustymabe.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/10/2015 11:18 AM, Charlie Drage wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> The problem that we have at the moment is most of our testing scripts
> >> / tools are located on personal Github user accounts. The context
> >> being atomicapp as well as the eclipse CDK integrations being on
> >> personal accounts.. Rather than searching everywhere, it would be prefered
> >> to have a standardized place for functional test scripts / cdk testing.
> >> Ideally a repo named "tests" as a catch-all.
> >> 
> >> There has been a discussion on container-tools in relation to creating
> >> a standardized repo:
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/2015-November/msg00120.html
> >> 
> >> Can a repo named "tests" be created on github.com/projectatomic/tests ?
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> 
> > 
> > "tests" is a little generic for the top level of projectatomic. I think there may have been a proposal to call this "adb-tests" for now, which sounds reasonable.
> > 
> > +1 - let's get this created.
> > 
> > Dusty
> > 
> 
> 

-- 

Charlie Drage
Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic
4096R / 0x9B3B446C
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C