[Container-tools] [Devtools] Future Nulecule spec! Need collaborators / spec writers to help on this :)

Suraj Deshmukh surajd at redhat.com
Wed Apr 13 17:51:43 UTC 2016


Hi,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Charlie Drage <cdrage at redhat.com> wrote:
> I would like us to collaborate and come up with a new spec version
> which is cleaner and easier to interpret.
>
> Decreasing the high-learning curve of our current spec and making
> collaboration and creation of a Nuleculized application *a lot* more straight-forward.
>
> I've come up with a raw example of what it would ideally look like.
>
> Below is a link to a pull-request that contains an example of an
> application using a new specification of Nulecule.
>
> https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/pull/205
>
> I've created it as a pull-request so people can easily comment on
> each-line of the specification as well as have a high-level discussion
> on the PR itself publically on GitHub.
>
> Not only that, but I've also included the concept of "manual" and
> "automatic" building of orchestrated containers via the Nulecule spec.
> Which some of you might find interesting.
>
> This is open to not only core-contributors but community contributors as
> well. If you've always wanted to have a say on the Nulecule spec and
> have an opinion on what it should look like, please feel free to
> contribute!

Nice work Charlie to start this up, +1.


>
> --
>
> Charlie Drage
> Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic
> 4096R / 0x9B3B446C
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devtools mailing list
> Devtools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools



-- 
- Suraj Deshmukh (surajd)

https://deshmukhsuraj.wordpress.com
https://twitter.com/surajd_




More information about the Container-tools mailing list