[Container-tools] A common naming scheme for Atomic App Docker containers

[Aaron Weitekamp]

I'm not sure I like any of the choices but whatever we do should be pulled
into a guidance doc like this:
https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels/blob/master/vendor/redhat/names.md


On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Charlie Drage <cdrage at redhat.com> wrote:

> There's been some different naming conventions in regards to atomicapp
> images.
>
> Some images are just standard names (ex. 'helloapache') while others
> have 'atomicapp' appended at the end of them. One of them just has
> '-app'.
>
> We should have a common naming practice when it comes down to
> atomicapp-esque images uploaded to Docker Hub.
>
> Currently these images will need to be converted to their proper
> names:
>         helloapache -> helloapache-atomicapp
>         guestbootgo-app -> guestbookgo-atomicapp
>         dockerfile-lint -> dockerfile-lint-atomicapp (what is this?)
>
> The same should go forward with images in
> github.com/projectatomic/nulecule-library
>
> Unfortunatley in order to convert the current images in hub.docker.com
> to their names as well as link them to the source code in
> github.com/projectatomic/nulecule-library they will have to be deleted
> and re-created within Docker hub.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
>
> Charlie Drage
> Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic
> 4096R / 0x9B3B446C
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20160106/315aa5fa/attachment.htm>