[Crash-utility] Crash extensions and GPL
Dave Anderson
anderson at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 13:32:05 UTC 2006
Castor Fu wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to modify the license for crash so extensions
> would not be subject to the GPL? Our developers create extensions
> which use our proprietary source code, and while they are most
> useful in-house, it'd be nice to be able to ship them to customers.
>
I am not a lawyer, nor am I an open source zealot, but the
crash utility is subject to the GPL due to the embedded gdb
module. Given that any extension would be in all probability
require a gdb service, how could you work around that?
Dave
>
> We're certainly interested in contributing back generically useful code,
> but this would be a 'nice to have'.
>
> I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure how to modify the license, but I could
> ask people here for help if this seems reasonable.
>
> -castor
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20061213/1a36370c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list