[dm-devel] Improve processing efficiency for addition and deletion of multipath devices

[tang.junhui at zte.com.cn]

Hi Martin,

>  This will fail because sdb is non-existent at the time you try - no?
Non-existent paths in merger uevents do not affect the entire algorithm. 
It should be considered at the time of implementation.

Your suggestion is meaningful, but I think we need to focus on the existed 
problem, 
resolve it, and then do more work to make it better in other areas. is not 
it?

Regards,Tang





发件人:         Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>
收件人:         tang.junhui at zte.com.cn, 
抄送:   dm-devel at redhat.com
日期:   2016/11/18 16:31
主题:   Re: Re: Re: [dm-devel] Improve processing efficiency for addition 
and deletion of multipath devices



On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 16:24 +0800, tang.junhui at zte.com.cn wrote:
> Hi Martin, 
> 
> In your case, my action is: 
> 1) merger uevents 1) 2) to one uevent "add sda sdb", and process them
> togother 

This will fail because sdb is non-existent at the time you try - no?

> Though the processing efficiency in such scenario is lower than
> yours, but it is simple and reliable,
> more importantly, Martin, you still focus on such special scene,
> which I concerned is like this: 

[...]

I understand what you're concerned with. I just think we need to do
both. I agree that many events for many different devices are more
likely. But once you start merging, you'd rather be prepared for
several events for the same phys device, too.

Martin

-- 
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/attachments/20161118/045fbceb/attachment.htm>