[edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 edk2-platforms 1/1] Silicon/DesignWare/Driver: DwEmacSnpDxe: Add DesignWare EMAC driver

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 11:14, Ooi, Tzy Way <tzy.way.ooi at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Biesheuvel.
>
> I would like to confirm with you on regards of one of the comment. There is one comment where you mentioned that:
> "I am aware that TX is usually the hot path in UEFI, but we should still try to map a buffer directly rather than copy the contents into uncached memory"
>
> I would like to confirm with you if do you mean I should do the DmaMap here instead of doing it at the beginning of the code while DmaAllocate is executed?

Yes.

Each time you receive a buffer, you DmaMap() it with the
MapOperationBusMasterRead attribute, and hand it to the device. After
the device is finished, you DmaUnmap() it again. This removes the need
for uncached memory.

On the RX path, you can allocate the buffers via AllocatePages()
rather than via DmaAllocateBuffer(), and map the for DMA using
DmaMap() with the MapOperationBusMasterWrite attribute. Once the
buffer is filled by the hardware, you can DmaUnmap() it and copy the
contents back to the caller, after which you can recycle the buffer or
free it.

> Or do you mean I shouldn’t copy it into a uncached memory region?
>

DmaAllocateBuffer() gives you an uncached region, so you should only
use it for data structures that are accessed and modified by the CPU
and the hardware at the same time, e.g., the descriptor rings. The
actual data buffers only need directional DMA, so using uncached
memory results in an unnecessary performance hit.


> Thank you
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 3:22 PM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel at edk2.groups.io>; Ooi, Tzy Way <tzy.way.ooi at intel.com>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>; Loh, Tien Hock <tien.hock.loh at intel.com>; leif.lindholm at linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 edk2-platforms 1/1] Silicon/DesignWare/Driver: DwEmacSnpDxe: Add DesignWare EMAC driver
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 03:37, Ooi, Tzy Way <tzy.way.ooi at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Maintainers,
> >
> > Please could you help to review this patch? Thanks.
> >
>
> I already did, but my email response got rejected twice
>
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/40829?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,emac,20,2,0,31541649

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#41726): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41726
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31541649/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-