el-4 confusion, misstatement on Wiki?

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Wed Aug 1 16:42:13 UTC 2007

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 06:40 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
> >>> Is this inaccurate/old?
> >>>
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-8d21749b79a31472a018664cc02e7f248e53fe1e
> >> It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
> > 
> > D'oh!  That wasn't what I meant to point to, but it looks like you
> > removed the part that confused me.  You did remove it, right?  The
> > changelog says, "move a part to the faq that belongs there".  But this
> > content is old, right?  I see you didn't put it into the FAQ.
> It is there in the FAQ now. Check again.

OK, I see the revised form.  I read the original, and it made it sound
like, "We aren't doing EPEL 4, use karan.centos.org instead."  That is,
the wording was confusing, and Thorsten cleaned it up, so good.

- Karsten
        Karsten Wade              ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070801/61fe8d06/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list