el-4 confusion, misstatement on Wiki?
kwade at redhat.com
Wed Aug 1 16:42:13 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 06:40 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
> >>> Is this inaccurate/old?
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-8d21749b79a31472a018664cc02e7f248e53fe1e
> >> It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
> > D'oh! That wasn't what I meant to point to, but it looks like you
> > removed the part that confused me. You did remove it, right? The
> > changelog says, "move a part to the faq that belongs there". But this
> > content is old, right? I see you didn't put it into the FAQ.
> It is there in the FAQ now. Check again.
OK, I see the revised form. I read the original, and it made it sound
like, "We aren't doing EPEL 4, use karan.centos.org instead." That is,
the wording was confusing, and Thorsten cleaned it up, so good.
Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the epel-devel-list