updates in builders?

Michael Stahnke mastahnke at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 00:33:26 UTC 2007

On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:11:53 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> wrote:
> > Personally, my vote is to always add the updates in.
> > It's easier to tell people that they must have an updated system in
> > order to use EPEL packages.
> >
> > Any other thoughts?
> I agree with Kevin.  The latest updates should be made available in the
> buildroot.  The /only/ time where this might not be done is at a point
> release date, where a /lot/ of updates will be released.  Depending on
> how EPEL works with CentOS, there might be a delay at this point.
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
That's probably reasonable and sane.  It would be nice if we could put
together some sort of schedule like when our builders get updates
after a RHEL (or I guess CentOS actually) update.  Is it 2 weeks?  Is
it whenever we get to it?


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list