David Lutterkort dlutter at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 17:54:33 UTC 2007

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> I requestet these packages. I use them with a ruby camping[1] application, 
> which is a framework like rails, but much more simplier. Therefore I would 
> not need rubygem-rails.

But if it were rubygem-activerecord and rubygem-activesupport, that
would be ok, too ? I'd rather include the rubygems than the straightup


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list