opensource at till.name
Wed Dec 12 18:15:40 UTC 2007
On Mi Dezember 12 2007, David Lutterkort wrote:
> But if it were rubygem-activerecord and rubygem-activesupport, that
> would be ok, too ? I'd rather include the rubygems than the straightup
I do not really know, does
| require 'active_record'
work, when only rubygem-acvtiverecord is installed, but not ruby-activerecord?
Then I guess it would be ok, too. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the epel-devel-list