Unstable EPEL? (frequent package updates)

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Michael A. Peters wrote:
> There are a few exceptions. I do think RHEL is justified in moving 
> Firefox to FF3. The reason is twofold -
> 
> 1) Firefox has a huge codebase. It would take extreme amount of man 
> power to continue to maintain FF 1.x without upstream.
> 
> 2) The web evolves quickly, and a browser must keep in touch with modern 
> web innovations, particularly in the area of javascript and CSS 
> implementation.
> 

A small addition here; RHEL does so by releasing a minor update to the 
entire operating system (5.2) - so everyone knows to look for changes 
like these. Is this something EPEL can do as well?

EPEL 5.1/nethack-3.4.3

EPEL 5.2/nethack-4.0 (for the right reasons)

Just a thought.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip