current orphan packages in EPEL

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Thursday 09 July 2009 04:48:29 pm Adam Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Dennis Gilmore<dennis at ausil.us> wrote:
> > yum  the big difference between RHEL-4 and CentOS-4 is up2date vs yum
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel-list mailing list
> > epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
> I'm currently getting info from centos-devel list about why yum is
> part of CentOS4 when its not in RHEL4. I think the deviation of
> Enterprise Linux, which is what we package extra packages for, is no
> grounds for us being concerned with our update/development model....
> Just my opinion.

They used yum because it was easier and more flexible than up2date.  we ship 
yum and sqlite for cobbler but keep the versions less that what is in CentOS. 
so that epel customers dont need to worry about our version replacing the 
CentOS one.

I know that I personally use CentOS  as i'm sure most of the EPEL developers 
do.   mock in epel ships with configs  pointing to CentOS for developers to 
build against. 

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090709/8da1b467/attachment.sig>