ppc is still a primary platform for epel-6?

Adam Goode adam at spicenitz.org
Sat Jul 31 00:59:57 UTC 2010

On 07/29/2010 09:24 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 06:19:56 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> is ppc still a primary platform for epel-6?
>> it seems from this build log that a noarch rpm can go to a ppc builder:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2355225&name=root.log
> ppc no, ppc64 yes.  rhel 6 has switched the default userland on power arches 
> to ppc64,  there is compatability rpms for ppc however likely not enough for 
> EPEL's needs.  so epel-6 builds for i686, x86_64 and ppc64,  we could 
> potentially do s390x also if there is enough demand

Is it possible to get shell access to a ppc64 machine with at least 1GB
of RAM? I would like to bootstrap the mlton compiler for ppc64 so it can
be built for el6. (Likewise I'd need access to an s390x machine if EPEL
starts supporting that.)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100730/977a7b67/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list