(1/3) Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2011-04-24

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:42:59 +0200
Robert Scheck <robert at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> > On 04/25/2011 12:47 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >>c) create a lzop package in EPEL, but keep it at the exact same
> > >>version as the RHEL one (ie, import the same version exactly and
> > >>try and keep it in sync).
> > >I prefer c), because not the whole world is x86_64.
> > Then go for it.
> 
> Eh...in the meantime I somehow recognized, that I'm the lzop owner...
> 
> I'm going to request an EPEL 6 branch (with clarification) and would
> add an "ExcludeArch: x86_64" to the *.spec file - any objections or
> better ideas?

Do not add the ExcludeArch. ;) 

I think if you do that, koji could have issues determining which repo
to get that from. At least thats my understanding... 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20110424/b1e07563/attachment.sig>