[et-mgmt-tools] solaris virt-install patches
Mark Johnson
johnson.nh at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 13:05:05 UTC 2007
On Dec 4, 2007 5:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> Mark Johnson wrote:
> > from conversation on #xen.... current Solaris virt-install patches attached.
> >
> > Disclaimers :-)
> > This are informational only (e.g. not proposing they be applied)..
> > They still need cleanup etc.. These patches are what are in the
> > current solaris builds.
> > We are currently still working on the lastest version of virt-install.
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> It was a bit hard to read your patches because they weren't attached
> with a text MIME-type. Renaming them as '*.txt' or '*.patch', or
> reconfiguring your MUA should fix that.
Sorry about that.. :-(
> mac-address-parse: Looks fine
>
> use-virsh-console: Sensible patch
>
> outgoing:
> This patch seems to be corrupt in some way. A diff of a diff?
I was in a rush, included that file by mistake..
> solaris-support:
>
> Solaris puts the Python interpreter in /bin instead of /usr/bin. This
> will break things on Linux so we should fix this so it can find the
> Python interpreter along the path. No idea how to fix this with Python
> but I'm sure there's a standard way involving 'env' or something similar.
No need to. We shouldn't be changing that. It's a bug on
our end (/bin can be a sym link to /usr/bin).
> The rest of the patch looks sensible. In general all this code needs
> rewriting to support capabilities and the storage API (once that's in
> libvirt), but for a fix now it's fine.
Thanks,
MRJ
More information about the et-mgmt-tools
mailing list