[et-mgmt-tools] The Missing Arch patch for reposync -- Updated Patch

[Michael DeHaan]

C. Daniel Chase wrote:
> As promised, here's the updated patch. FYI, worked great with the
> current source from git. 

Excellent, thanks ... I'll apply this shortly.


> I'm just getting used to git--I use Subversion
> most of the time. Do you call it HEAD?

>  I looked for a revision number to
> specify, show you are aware of what the patch was against in case there
> were updates prior to my getting this back to you, but could not find
> any. Guess git requires some study... :-)
>   
Yeah, git also uses 'HEAD'.   As far as I know git users refer to 
versions using the
checksums as there is no central authoritative repository as far as git 
itself is concerned.

Thanks!
> -Dan
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> et-mgmt-tools mailing list
> et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools