[et-mgmt-tools] Seperate mailing lists revisited?

[John Eckersberg]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael DeHaan wrote:
| With Cobbler, virsh, and virt-manager both getting a lot of traffic now
| (which is great!), I'm thinking we might want to revisit the idea of
| having seperate mailing lists.   Other similar projects like
| ovirt/func/etc have seperate lists, for instance.
|
| By default we could auto-invite everyone here to the new cobbler list,
| but we would not auto-subscribe everyone because that may not be desired.
|
| Thoughts?
|
| --Michael
|
| _______________________________________________
| et-mgmt-tools mailing list
| et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
| https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

Yes separate lists would be nice.

- --
John Eckersberg
Production Operations
Red Hat, Inc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhqUREACgkQO5VSO/Qqm+iSNwCdG6vDSM5XEZ4k+DKyCkZheCRN
2F8AoLBmFAt7wVMGM4Qx9xKbcNyutXmT
=CsWr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----