[et-mgmt-tools] Seperate mailing lists revisited?

[Michael DeHaan]

John Eckersberg wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael DeHaan wrote:
> | With Cobbler, virsh, and virt-manager both getting a lot of traffic now
> | (which is great!), I'm thinking we might want to revisit the idea of
> | having seperate mailing lists.   Other similar projects like
> | ovirt/func/etc have seperate lists, for instance.
> |
> | By default we could auto-invite everyone here to the new cobbler list,
> | but we would not auto-subscribe everyone because that may not be 
> desired.
> |
> | Thoughts?
> |
> | --Michael
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | et-mgmt-tools mailing list
> | et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
> | https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
>
> Yes separate lists would be nice.
>
> - --
> John Eckersberg
> Production Operations
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkhqUREACgkQO5VSO/Qqm+iSNwCdG6vDSM5XEZ4k+DKyCkZheCRN
> 2F8AoLBmFAt7wVMGM4Qx9xKbcNyutXmT
> =CsWr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> et-mgmt-tools mailing list
> et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

I will make it so.  Details TBD.