[et-mgmt-tools] Do you use cobbler's support for dnsmasq?

[Michael DeHaan]

Sandor W. Sklar wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
>>
>> Still, more feedback welcome... as I'm curious as to how widely this 
>> is being used (and also how
>> high dnsmasq is scaling)
>
> Since you said more feedback is welcome, I'll state that we in fact do 
> not use any of the DNS features of cobbler; we've already got a 
> large-scale, robust DNS service and management system, so, vis-a-vis 
> this thread, I just hope that whatever decision is made, it doesn't 
> have too much impact on those of us not using Cobbler for DNS.
>
> Thanks,
> -s-

It will not make any impact. Mainly I just needed feedback on dnsmasq. I 
know quite a few people are using the ISC support.

The idea with Cobbler is that if you /do/ want to get out of the 
business of maintaining your DHCP/DNS/kickstart/system-definition info 
in 3 places, cobbler will let you do it. And while it is "batteries 
included", we don't require any of those to be used, nor are they on by 
default.

>
> _______________________________________________
> et-mgmt-tools mailing list
> et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools