[fab] Fedora as Free Software?
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Jun 13 19:04:14 UTC 2006
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Ok here is what is out of Fedora development this morning.. hoping
> that the License tag is accurate. There are about 238 packages that
> need 'cleanups' in one form or another.. my counting had to be done
> by hand because style issues.
>
> Total Packages: 1155
> GPL Only: 504
> LGPL Only: 137
> MIT/X11: 119
> BSD: 58
> Artistic/GPL: 42
> MIT: 16
> GPL/LGPL: 14
> Public Domain: 17
> Is it worth filing bugs against the 200+ packages that need a cleanup?
I'd suggest waiting at least until a license format standard/guideline
is chosen.
> And who would formulate a standard Licensing schema for this? [Again is
> it worth it.. beyond pub arguments?]
I'd argue this should fall under Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list