[fab] Non-standard kernels in the Fedora Multiverse

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 12:02 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:09:03PM -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:58 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > 
> > > I think Jeremy's fear about misattribution of bugs is a valid one.
> > > 
> > > I have a dream, though.
> > > 
> > > I have a dream of a desktop bugzilla client in Fedora.  When you find a 
> > > bug, you fire up the prominently-placed client.  The client presents you 
> > > with package names, and you select which package the bug was in.  The 
> > > client will be smart enough to reconcile any questions about "which repo 
> > > this package came from".
> > > 
> > > Is this a crazy dream?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  But it'd certainly require a 
> > > visionary QA person to make it happen.  Right, Will?
> > 
> > Yes! I have this same dream! I really REALLY want to see tighter
> > integration between Fedora and our bug reporting/tracking stuff. I want:
> > 
> > 1) A nice client (maybe built from bug-buddy) for people to quickly and
> > easily report bugs *without a bugzilla account*. This client would
> > gather pertinent system info (Fedora or Alternatives package? Weirdo
> > kernel?) and include it in the bug report.
> 
> Could it do things like refuse to report bugs from machines that have
> tainted kernels?  Or is that being too harsh in some peoples opinions?

Too harsh. The problem might be completely unrelated to the modules.

Rahul