Request for Trademark Approval (Fedora AOS Spin)

[Seth Vidal]

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 20:18 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:35 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:25 -0600, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > Might I suggest, as an alternative to punching me in the head, actually
> > > *commenting on the draft* as I have repeatedly requested? ;-)
> > 
> > Well this sort of thing slipped my mind.  But I would prefer if we had
> > some basic level of packages we considered essential to having something
> > called 'Fedora'.
> 
> This is a good point.  I can imagine a number of practices that we would
> not want to put under the Fedora name, such as turning off all security
> or maybe using a different package manager than yum.

I don't really see how either matters, really.

If they turn off all security and make 'honey pot linux - based on
fedora' as a livecd for catching would-be crackers, I have no problem
with that. It would be a good thing to have fedora's name on, I think.

If they put apt in place (and modify massive amounts of anaconda, etc,
to make it all work) then why not?

How does it hurt us?

-sv