Bugzilla permissions - cla_done required?
jonstanley at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 16:20:35 UTC 2008
Sent the prior one way too soon (GMail keyboard shortcuts did that for me :) ).
On Feb 11, 2008 8:18 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> Also, bz work falls somewhere between "Mailing list member" and "Wiki
> contributor." The former is a discussion and information exchange, the
> later is a contribution of content, such as a patch.
Or a release note, or anything else really. We are not the only
distribution that requires signing an agreement in order to gain full
access to triage bugs. In fact, Ubuntu's requirements are much
more onerous than ours. We basically say cla_done and you're in.
They obviously have a whole different set of requirements.
> I missed this part. FESCo has already decided how they want this
> handled? And some folks aren't happy with that situation?
Correct. At the 1/24 meeting, there was quite lively discussion of
this. It was decided that for now we would require cla_done, and
revisit when FAS2 comes around.
> Without FAS2, I don't see a way around this. That is, I guess something
> of a click-through CLA could be hacked up, by why spend the time on that
> over finishing FAS2?
Agreed. I'm just the messenger :)
More information about the fedora-advisory-board