Fedora Board election results

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 23:12 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 24.06.2008 23:02, Max Spevack wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > 
> >> But three of those four elected are Red Hat employees for whom working 
> >> and contributing to Fedora is part of their job (afaik; but is it the 
> >> case for Seth? not completely sure, sorry.
> > Spot, Jesse, and Seth are all paid to spend 100% of their working time 
> > on tasks directly related to Fedora, or upstream tools (packages, build 
> > system, yum) that Fedora uses.
> 
> Thx Max for the clarification.
> 
> And just a clarification: there is nothing wrong with being a Red Hat 
> employee working on Fedora being elected to the board. It's just that 
> these three guys imho without purpose had a huge advantage in the 
> election due to their work.
> 
> CU
> knurd
> 
> <humor>
> P.S.: Earlier in this thread this could be read:
> 
> >> Is there any sort of criteria they use to pick the last seat?  I'm just
> >> curious.
> > The last seat is picked with the goal of balancing the background of the
> > other seats on the Board.
> 
> So we get a woman on board?
> 
> /me hides
> 
> </humor>

What if a woman on the short list for this spot was a Red Hat employee?

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080624/5c0cedb5/attachment.sig>