Fwd: Range Voting for steering commitee
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 23:34:51 UTC 2008
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 01:07 +0200, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> Hey guys,
> this might interest you.
Indeed it does. Forwarding also to f-a-b for its high interest value.
Paul [...keep reading...]
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: CLAY S <clay at brokenladder.com>
> Date: Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM
> Subject: Range Voting for steering commitee
> To: dimitris at glezos.com
> My name is Clay Shentrup, and I work with the Center for Range Voting.
> I just read about a possible use of Range Voting for steering
> committee elections.
> I think this is great news for voting reform community. However I see
> that the election is for "seats", not just a single seat, and I would
> therefore suggest Reweighted Range Voting, because it inherently gives
> ideologically-proportional representation, which would seem to lead to
> better more representative leadership. That is, rather than getting 7
> widely liked "centrists", you'd get 7 people who whose appeal is more
> representative of segments of the community doing the voting. This
> inherently leads to more debate and discussion, and in theory at
> least, better ultimate decisions.
> In addition, our organization would love the opportunity to evaluate
> anonymized ballot data, to look for voting trends that can tell us
> more about the prevalence of e.g. strategic voting using this voting
> Best regards,
> clay shentrup
> san francisco, ca
> phone: 206.801.0484
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the fedora-advisory-board