Spins process - technical requirements
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 18:36:42 UTC 2008
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:58AM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > They seem reasonable for things which are aspiring to be Fedora(tm)
> > Spins. For those that don't want to use either of the trademarks, they're
> > obviously not that relevant.
> Brings up an excellent question. Do they apply for just the main
> Fedora trademark, or also the secondary mark? IMHO, we don't want to
> be sullying the reputation of the secondary mark because we have a
> sub-standard community-produced spin.
The "Fedora Remix" mark was invented precisely to avoid community
members having to go through an approval process. I made a wiki page
for easy redirection if needed:
> Though I *believe*, however I'm not sure, that spins carrying the
> secondary mark would be allowed to use third-party content in their
> spins. Is this correct?
That's correct. The new trademark guidelines lay out the use cases
for the Fedora Remix mark:
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the fedora-advisory-board