Spins process - technical requirements

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 18:36:42 UTC 2008

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:58AM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > They seem reasonable for things which are aspiring to be Fedora(tm)
> > Spins. For those that don't want to use either of the trademarks, they're
> > obviously not that relevant.
> Brings up an excellent question. Do they apply for just the main
> Fedora trademark, or also the secondary mark? IMHO, we don't want to
> be sullying the reputation of the secondary mark because we have a
> sub-standard community-produced spin.

The "Fedora Remix" mark was invented precisely to avoid community
members having to go through an approval process.  I made a wiki page
for easy redirection if needed:


> Though I *believe*, however I'm not sure, that spins carrying the
> secondary mark would be allowed to use third-party content in their
> spins. Is this correct?

That's correct.  The new trademark guidelines lay out the use cases
for the Fedora Remix mark:


Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20081110/cd9d9c2c/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list